-
Finance
-

International Funds Pledge $12.5m to Protect Guyana's Acarai–Rupununi Forests

By
Diligence Posts Editorial Team

Four international conservation organisations have committed $12.5 million to a plan to secure permanent protection for more than one million hectares of primary rainforest in southern Guyana. The Bezos Earth Fund, the Andes Amazon Fund, Nia Tero and Rainforest Trust are behind the pledge, which supports a proposal advanced by President Irfaan Ali. The area covers about 2.4 million acres along the Acarai–Rupununi Corridor.

The funding sits within Guyana's national development strategy, which the government has tied to forest stewardship for several years. It also bears on the country's contribution to the global 30x30 target, under which governments have agreed to protect 30 per cent of land and sea by 2030. Securing the corridor would place a very large block of Guyanese territory under formal protection.

The corridor is among the largest contiguous intact forest systems remaining in the Americas. Scale matters here. Unbroken canopy allows animals to range over wide areas and keeps ecological processes running across the whole landscape, whereas fragmented forest tends to lose species and function over time.

The forest holds large stores of carbon in its trees and soils, and keeping it standing prevents that carbon from reaching the atmosphere. The corridor also contains drainage basins that feed rivers across the region. Many of the plants and animals found there occur nowhere else.

Under the plans, candidate lands would move into legally binding protected zones with defined spatial boundaries. Boundaries written into law give regulators and communities a fixed reference point if disputes arise. The designation is intended to be permanent.

The framework also seeks to restrict high-impact commercial activity inside the perimeter. Industrial logging and mining would be prohibited. The mining restriction carries particular weight in Guyana, where gold extraction is a major source of export earnings and has contributed to forest loss and river pollution in other parts of the country.

Indigenous and local communities live near or within the target territory, and the proposal incorporates Free, Prior and Informed Consent, known as FPIC. The standard requires that communities are consulted before projects affecting their land go ahead, and that they can withhold agreement. Land rights have been a long-running concern for Indigenous peoples in Guyana, and Nia Tero, one of the funders, works with Indigenous peoples on land and governance questions.

Residents are expected to take part directly in stewardship, including park management and local sustainability initiatives. Such roles would create paid work and income linked to the upkeep of the forest. The design of the co-management arrangements will determine how far the economic benefit reaches local households and how much authority communities hold in day-to-day decisions.

The $12.5 million is described as an initial commitment. The funders present it as seed capital intended to attract further institutional and philanthropic investment. Legal designation, boundary surveys, community consultation and long-term management each carry costs, and a single pledge of this size is unlikely to meet them all over the decades that permanent protection implies.

Guyana's position illustrates a wider question for developing nations that hold large forests while pursuing economic growth. Governments in that position often face pressure to convert land into income, and protection requires financing that offsets what the land might otherwise earn. The offshore oil industry has expanded the Guyanese economy rapidly in recent years, which gives the government more room to choose than many forest nations have.

Whether the Acarai–Rupununi arrangement holds, and whether further funders join the first four, will be watched by other governments weighing similar decisions. The terms of the legal protections and the standing given to Indigenous communities will be the measures against which the project is judged.

‍