The United States has imposed a 12.5 per cent tariff on nearly all exports from Guyana after designating the country among 60 nations judged to have failed in preventing the importation of goods made using forced labour. The measure, authorised by the Office of the US Trade Representative, marks a significant escalation in Washington's approach to enforcing labour standards through trade policy rather than diplomatic channels.

The tariff followed an extended review process. The USTR held multiple public hearings and examined over a thousand written submissions before reaching its determination. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said decades of diplomatic engagement had failed to remove forced labour from global supply chains, and argued that the current administration was prepared to use trade authority more forcefully to compel other countries to match the century-old American prohibition on such imports. Washington has characterised the absence of comparable import restrictions elsewhere as both a human rights failure and a distortion of fair trade.

Guyanese officials have rejected the basis for the action. Speaking during the USTR's public hearings, the Permanent Secretary of Guyana's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said there was no evidence that goods linked to forced labour were being produced in, imported into, or exported from the country. Georgetown has argued that any allegations of this kind warrant formal investigation rather than immediate economic penalties, and has questioned why a tariff was applied before such evidence was presented.

Guyana's government has pointed to its domestic enforcement record in an effort to counter the claims underpinning the tariff. The Ministry of Labour conducted more than 2,000 inspections across various sectors as of June 2026, according to officials, without identifying substantiated cases of forced labour. The Guyana Revenue Authority has said it has no knowledge of illicit goods entering the country through its ports, and officials note that customs legislation already permits the government to block imports where credible evidence of forced labour exists.

Guyana's legal framework also featured prominently in the government's response. Forced labour is prohibited under the national constitution and under the Combating of Trafficking in Persons Act, and the country has ratified International Labour Organisation conventions 29 and 105, both of which address forced and compulsory labour. Officials describe these commitments as evidence that the country's legal architecture already aligns with international standards, even without a tariff to enforce it.

The economic relationship between the two countries complicates the picture further. American companies, particularly in the energy sector, have an extensive and largely unrestricted presence in Guyana, and US exports to the country have grown considerably over the past two decades. That relationship has expanded alongside Guyana's emergence as an oil producer, a development that has drawn heavy American investment and deepened commercial ties between the two governments.

Rather than accept the tariff as a resolved matter, Guyana has asked Washington to pursue collaborative measures instead, including capacity building, intelligence sharing and the development of shared detection standards. Officials in Georgetown have suggested that such an approach would address any genuine gaps in enforcement more effectively than a blanket trade penalty applied without a documented case.

The timing of the tariff has added a further complication. The two countries are currently negotiating a reciprocal trade agreement, and Guyanese officials have warned that the sudden imposition of tariffs risks unsettling those talks. Georgetown has not withdrawn from the negotiations, but has made clear that it views the tariff as inconsistent with the spirit of an agreement meant to strengthen, rather than strain, the commercial relationship between the two countries.

No timeline has been given for a review of the designation, and it remains unclear what evidentiary threshold Guyana would need to meet for the tariff to be reconsidered.

‍