The Ministry of Housing has formally rejected accusations from the Opposition Leader that the proposed Versailles to Parika Four-Lane Highway constitutes "highway robbery." The dispute centres on the project's estimated G$121 billion cost in Region Three, which the Opposition has compared unfavourably to the G$13.3 billion spent on the Eccles to Great Diamond Highway in Region Four. That comparison, ministry officials say, misrepresents the true financial picture.

The Ministry's core defence rests on the argument that judging the two projects by their headline figures alone is simplistic to the point of being misleading. Officials maintain that the comparison fails to account for fundamental discrepancies in the scale of works involved, the engineering requirements each project demands, and the broader scope of development attached to the newer scheme. A single top-line figure, they argue, cannot capture what separates a modest road upgrade from a large-scale infrastructure programme.

Part of the disparity, according to the Ministry, lies in timing. The Region Four highway's G$13.3 billion figure was a final contract value from a project completed in 2022 and 2023. The Region Three estimate of G$121 billion, by contrast, is a pre-award projection prepared for 2026. In the years between, the cost of labour, fuel, and core building materials such as sand, cement, and steel has risen considerably, and the Ministry argues that any credible estimate must reflect those increases rather than costs frozen at an earlier point.

The physical scale of the two projects also diverges sharply. The proposed Region Three highway runs 20.74 kilometres, well over double the 8.6 kilometres covered by the Region Four road. The preparation base for the new route is more than twice as wide as its predecessor, and the Ministry calculates the total footprint of the project at nearly five times larger. Auxiliary infrastructure shows an even starker gap. Region Three's plans include roughly 68 kilometres of access roads, compared with less than one kilometre attached to the Region Four scheme.

Structural requirements differ substantially as well. The new highway calls for 62 bridges against 40 on the older route, with several of the Region Three structures considerably longer than anything built for Region Four. Culvert numbers follow a similar pattern. Ground conditions along the Region Three corridor have also demanded extensive geotechnical work that the earlier project never required, including nearly four kilometres of erosion revetments and more than 31,000 metres of vertical drains, installed to stabilise weak coastal soils that would otherwise threaten the road's foundations.

Not every factor favours the newer project's cost profile, and the Ministry has been willing to say so. Officials acknowledged that the Region Four road used reinforced concrete, a material with a higher upfront cost than the asphaltic concrete planned for Region Three, and that the older project included concrete medians and drainage. This concession, however, does the Opposition's argument little service in the Ministry's view. A single materials choice, officials say, cannot offset the far greater volume of earthworks, structures, and auxiliary infrastructure built into the newer scheme.

The Ministry's closing argument turns on methodology. Calculating a cost per kilometre using only the main highway's length, officials say, produces a figure that looks artificially inflated because it ignores everything else the budget is paying for. The G$121 billion estimate, they insist, funds an integrated infrastructure programme rather than a single stretch of tarmac, and measuring it against the far narrower scope of the 2022 Region Four project is, in their words, technically unsound.

‍