Guyana has changed how foreign workers complete their immigration paperwork. Authorities now require expatriates and foreign nationals deployed to the country to appear in person to finalise the endorsement of their work permits. The change affects how global mobility teams plan staff deployments and represents an immediate compliance update for multinational corporations operating in, or expanding into, the Guyanese market.

The shift removes a process that companies had relied on for years. Until now, corporations could appoint authorised representatives, legal counsel or local agents to handle the endorsement process on an employee's behalf. That option no longer exists for work permits. Foreign staff themselves must now attend the immigration office.

The practical effect on scheduling is significant. An expatriate must appear in person to process the endorsement, then return separately to collect their passport once the endorsement has been completed. In most cases this requires two visits to the immigration office on the same business day, since passports are not handed back at the point of submission. For a company moving a single employee, this might mean little more than a day lost to administration. For firms relocating several staff at once, the cumulative effect on schedules and productivity becomes harder to absorb, particularly where employees are travelling from overseas specifically for the appointment and have limited time in the country.

The driver behind the change is a new biometric registration system that immigration authorities have begun rolling out. The wider biometric infrastructure remains in a pilot phase, and not all immigration functions have been brought under it yet. Compliance for work permit endorsements, however, is already being enforced strictly, with no exceptions reported for proxy submissions regardless of the size or standing of the employer.

The move places Guyana alongside a growing number of countries tightening immigration controls through biometric verification. Border agencies in numerous jurisdictions have adopted fingerprint and facial recognition systems in recent years, often citing security and fraud prevention as the rationale. Businesses with international workforces have had to adjust their internal processes accordingly, and Guyana's introduction of mandatory in-person biometrics for work permits fits within that broader pattern, even as the country's own system is still being tested.

For now, the in-person requirement is confined to work permit endorsements. Other common immigration processes, including standard visa extensions and general visa endorsements, are not currently affected by the biometric mandate and can still proceed through existing channels. This distinction matters for companies managing varied immigration needs across their workforce, since not every category of foreign worker will encounter the same requirement.

That boundary may not hold indefinitely. Because the broader biometric system is still in pilot testing, there is no confirmed timeline for whether or how it might extend to other visa categories. Immigration authorities have given no public indication of when the pilot will conclude or what its eventual scope will be. Corporate compliance officers and risk managers operating in Guyana should treat the current limited scope as provisional rather than fixed, and should monitor for further announcements as the pilot progresses.

Multinational corporations with staff in or moving to Guyana would do well to coordinate closely with local legal counsel and immigration specialists in the near term. The removal of proxy processing means that scheduling now depends on the availability of the employee, not just the efficiency of a local agent, and that variable is harder to control from a head office overseas.

Proactive scheduling is the most practical safeguard available. Companies should build the two-visit requirement into deployment timelines well ahead of an employee's intended start date, accounting for the possibility of delays at the immigration office itself. Project launches, international assignments and cross-border service contracts that depend on timely staff deployment to Guyana could otherwise be affected by an administrative step that, until recently, did not require the employee's physical presence at all.

‍